Real-life efficacy and safety of Ustekinumab as second- or third-line therapy in Crohn's disease: results from a large Italian cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Ustekinumab (UST) is an anti-IL12/23 antibody for the treatment of Crohn's Disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of UST in a large population-based cohort of CD patients who failed previous treatment with other biologics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 194 CD patients (108 males and 86 females, mean age 48 years (range 38-58 years) were retrospectively reviewed. 147 patients were already treated with anti-TNFα (75.8%), and 47 (24.2%) patients were already treated with anti-TNFα and vedolizumab. Concomitant treatment with steroids was present in 177 (91.2%) patients. RESULTS: At week 12, clinical remission was achieved in 146 (75.2%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 6 months, clinical remission was maintained in 135 (69.6%) patients; at that time, mucosal healing was assessed in 62 (31.9%) patients, and it was achieved in 33 (53.2) patients. Three (1.5%) patients were submitted to surgery. Steroid-free remission was achieved in 115 (59.3%) patients. Both serum C-Reactive Protein and Fecal Calprotectin (FC) levels were significantly reduced with respect to baseline levels during follow-up. A logistic regression, UST therapy as third-line therapy (after both anti-TNFα and vedolizumab), FC >200 µg/g, and HBI ≥8 were significantly associated with lack of remission. Adverse events occurred in 5 (2.6%) patients, and four of them required suspension of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: UST seemed to be really effective and safe in CD patients unresponsive to other biologic treatments, especially when used as second-line treatment.

Predictive value of time-intensity curves obtained with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the follow-up of 30 patients with Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: CEUS can provide accurate quantitative estimates of intestinal wall microvascularization in Crohn's disease. We hypothesized that inflammation of the intestinal wall is correlated not with the amount of wall vascularization (study of vascularization patterns, SVP) but with the degree of wall flow during a period of time (time-intensity study, TIS). Our objective was to discover whether CEUS SPV and/or CEUS-TIS reflect(s) vascular inflammation of the intestinal wall and display(s) correlation with clinical activity of the disease at the time of the examination (T0) or at the 3- and 6-month follow-up (T3, T6). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 patients with Crohn's disease (12 men, 18 women, mean age: 41.96 years; treatment: 5-ASA (n = 8), steroids (n = 13), anti-TNF (n = 7), azathioprine (n = 2) were studied with CEUS SPV and CEUS-TIS and followed for at least 6 months. The sonographic examinations were performed with SonoVue (BR1, Bracco) and a dedicated scanner (TECHNOS MPX, Esaote) equipped with software for calculation of time-intensity curves. Four vascular patterns (1: vascularization of the entire wall; 2: vascularization of >50% of the wall; 3: flow exclusively within the submucosal layer; 4: no signal). The semiquantitative analysis consisted in measurement of the area under the curve (AUC) (cut-off between active and inactive disease, 15), mean intesnity (IMA) (cut-off = 10). Each examination (180 s) was digitally recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: T0: cDAI <150 in 22 pts; cDAI > 150 in 8; T3: 22 pts. with cDAI<150, 8 with cDAI >150. At T0 CEUS SPV and CEUS-TIS both displayed low specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and negative predictive values (p = ns). At T0, CEUS SPV produced 8 true positives (TP), 15 true negatives (TN), 8 false positives (FP), 0 false negative (FN) (sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 68.2%; diagnostic accuracy: 69.5%; Positive predictive value (PPV): 100%; negative predictive value (NPV: 53.3%), and CEUS-TIS produced 6 TP, 18 TN, 4 FP, 2 FN (sensitivity 75%; specificity: 81.8%; diagnostic accuracy: 75%; PPV: 60%; NPV: 90%). At T3, CEUS SPV produced 8 TP, 12 TN, 7 FP, 3 FN (sensitivity: 72.7%; specificity: 63.2%; diagnostic accuracy: 50%; PPV: 53.3%; NPV: 80%), and CEUS SIT produced the following results: 10 TP, 19 TN, 0 FP, 1 FN (sensitivity: 90,9%; specificity: 100%; diagnostic accuracy: 96,5%; PPV: 100%; NPV: 95%). At T3 CEUS-SVP displayed low sensitivity and low diagnostic accuracy, whereas SIT was able to predict clinical activity during follow-up in all but one case (which showed reactivation after 6 months) (p = 0.001) CONCLUSION: CEUS-TIS alone was found to reflect vascular inflammation of the intestinal wall in Crohn's disease and predicted clinical activity during follow-up.